{"id":38995,"date":"2021-07-23T15:04:59","date_gmt":"2021-07-23T13:04:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/?page_id=38995"},"modified":"2024-07-16T15:43:54","modified_gmt":"2024-07-16T13:43:54","slug":"iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/","title":{"rendered":"ISO 13849-1,2\tSafety of Machinery"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"row\"  id=\"row-1239383112\">\n\n\n\t<div id=\"col-1025397349\" class=\"col small-12 large-12\"  >\n\t\t<div class=\"col-inner\"  >\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n  <div id=\"page-header-1281259517\" class=\"page-header-wrapper\">\n  <div class=\"page-title light simple-title\">\n\n    \n    <div class=\"page-title-inner container align-center flex-row medium-flex-wrap row-reverse\" >\n            <div class=\"title-content flex-col flex-left text-left medium-text-center\">\n        <div class=\"title-breadcrumbs pb-half pt-half\"><nav class=\"woocommerce-breadcrumb breadcrumbs uppercase\">Home<\/nav><\/div>      <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n\n       <\/div>\n    <\/div>\n  \n\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"row\"  id=\"row-1519890093\">\n\n\n\t<div id=\"col-1838966886\" class=\"col small-12 large-12\"  >\n\t\t<div class=\"col-inner\"  >\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n<div class=\"row\"  id=\"row-241103699\">\n\n\n\t<div id=\"col-495994184\" class=\"col small-12 large-12\"  >\n\t\t<div class=\"col-inner\"  >\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n\t<div id=\"text-826868708\" class=\"text txt-page-title\">\n\t\t\n\n<h1>ISO 13849-1,2 Safety of Machinery<\/h1>\n\t\t\n<style>\n#text-826868708 {\n  color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\n}\n#text-826868708 > * {\n  color: rgb(0, 0, 0);\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n<h2>Safety Related Parts of Control Systems &#8211; General principles for design<\/h2>\n\t<div id=\"text-3319381034\" class=\"text cutom-ul\">\n\t\t\n\n<div>EN ISO 13849-1,2 are used as part of the systematic risk reduction described in ISO 12100 for the part concerning the design of the machine safety-related control system.<\/div>\n<p>ISO 13849-1 is a Standard for designing the parts of the control system that implement the safety functions. It can be used for all types of machinery regardless of the type of technology used (electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic, etc.). These parts can be made up of hardware and \/ or software and can be separated from the machine control system or be an integral part of it.<\/p>\n<p>ISO 13849-1 is applicable only if the safety function is demanded with a frequency higher than once a year (operation in High demand mode) or if it is demanded continuously (Continuous mode of operation) because the tables and formulas provided in the standard relate to these two modes of operation.<\/p>\n<p>Examples of products that are commonly integrated into a safety-related control system are: relays, solenoid valves, position switches, configurable PLCs, safety modules, motor drives, two-hand control devices, pressure sensitive equipment, photoelectric barriers, laser scanner.<\/p>\n<p>The parts of the machine control system that perform safety-related tasks are designated with the acronym SRP \/ CS (Safety Related Parts of Control System).<\/p>\n<p>In addition to implementing safety functions, an SRP \/ CS can also provide operational functions, but only the parts that are safety-related fall within the scope of the standard<\/p>\n<div>For the evaluation of the safety performance of an SRP \/ CS, the term PL (Performance Level) is used which specifies the ability of an SRP \/ CS to ensure adequate risk reduction within predefined operating conditions.<\/div>\n<div><br>The performance level is measured on a 5-level scale, from PL a to PL e; each level is associated with a range of values of mean probability of dangerous failure (PFH<sub>D<\/sub>).<\/div>\n<div>&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div>\n<table style=\"width: 50%; border-collapse: collapse;\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 13.9922%;\">\n<h5>PL<\/h5>\n<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 86.0078%;\">\n<h5>Average probability of dangerous failure per hour (PFH<sub>D<\/sub>)&nbsp;1\/h<\/h5>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 13.9922%;\">a<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 86.0078%;\">\u2265 10<sup>-5<\/sup> a &lt; 10<sup>-4<\/sup><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 13.9922%;\">b<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 86.0078%;\">\u2265 3 x 10<sup>-6<\/sup> a &lt; 10<sup>-5<\/sup><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 13.9922%;\">c<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 86.0078%;\">\u2265 10<sup>-6<\/sup> a &lt; 3 x10<sup>-6<\/sup><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 13.9922%;\">d<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 86.0078%;\">\u2265 10<sup>-7<\/sup> a &lt; 10<sup>-6<\/sup><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 13.9922%;\">e<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 86.0078%;\">\u2265 10<sup>-8<\/sup> a &lt; 10<sup>-7<\/sup><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<div>&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div>Fig. 5 &#8211; Table of ISO 13849 standard: Performance leves (PL)<\/div>\n\t\t\n<style>\n#text-3319381034 {\n  color: rgb(0,0,0);\n}\n#text-3319381034 > * {\n  color: rgb(0,0,0);\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\t<div id=\"gap-1759042571\" class=\"gap-element clearfix\" style=\"display:block; height:auto;\">\n\t\t\n<style>\n#gap-1759042571 {\n  padding-top: 30px;\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n<h2>Risk assessment and required Performance Level &#8211; PL r assignment<\/h2>\n<p>For each safety function identified, the designer must decide what is the contribution to risk reduction the safety function should provide.<\/p>\n<p>This contribution does not cover the overall machine risk but only the part of risk related to the application of that particular safety function.<\/p>\n<p>The parameter. that is used to estabilsh what is the amount of risk reduction that the safety function is required to provide is the PL r (Performance Level Required).<\/p>\n<p>Parameter PL, instead, represents the Performance Level reached by the hardware implementing the safety function. PL of the hardware must be equal to or higher than specified PL r.<\/p>\n<p>After deciding the necessary PL r, it is necessary to design a suitable SRP \/ CS, calculate the resulting PL of that piece of hardware and check if it is greater than or equal to the PL r.<\/p>\n<p>To get the contribution to risk reduction that must be provided by the safety- related function a graph of decisions is used, leading to univocal identification of the PL r. If more than one safety-related function are identified, PL r shall be identified for each of them.<\/p>\n\t<section class=\"section\" id=\"section_896749744\">\n\t\t<div class=\"bg section-bg fill bg-fill  bg-loaded\" >\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t<div class=\"section-bg-overlay absolute fill\"><\/div>\n\t\t\t\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t<div class=\"section-content relative\">\n\t\t\t\n\n<div class=\"row row-collapse row-full-width align-middle\"  id=\"row-318595682\">\n\n\n\t<div id=\"col-2006258831\" class=\"col medium-4 small-12 large-4\"  >\n\t\t<div class=\"col-inner text-center\" style=\"max-width:520px;\" >\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n<div style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>S:severity of injury<\/strong><\/div>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">S1: Slight injury generally reversible<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">S2: Serious injury generally irreversible or died<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>F:frequency or time exposure to hazard<\/strong><\/div>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">F1: From rare to short and or short exposure time<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">F2: From frequent to continuous and or long&nbsp;exposure time<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div style=\"text-align: left;\"><strong>P: avoidable risk or limitation of damage<\/strong><\/div>\n<div style=\"text-align: left;\">(it depends on the speed of the event, the possibility of perception of danger and the possibility of escape)&nbsp;<\/div>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">P1:avoidable within given conditions<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">P2: almost unavoidable<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\n<style>\n#col-2006258831 > .col-inner {\n  padding: 10% 10% 10% 10%;\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\n\t<div id=\"col-706031724\" class=\"col medium-8 small-12 large-8\"  >\n\t\t<div class=\"col-inner\"  >\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n\t<div class=\"img has-hover x md-x lg-x y md-y lg-y\" id=\"image_397179838\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"img-inner dark\" >\n\t\t\t<img width=\"1020\" height=\"510\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-1-1024x512.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large\" alt=\"\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-1-1024x512.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-1-300x150.png 300w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-1-768x384.png 768w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-1-1536x768.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-1-2048x1024.png 2048w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-1-510x255.png 510w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1020px) 100vw, 1020px\" \/>\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n<style>\n#image_397179838 {\n  width: 100%;\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\n<\/div>\n\t<div id=\"text-1633075877\" class=\"text\">\n\t\t\n\n<p>Fig. 6 &#8211; Graph of decisions for evaluation of the Pl r<\/p>\n\t\t\n<style>\n#text-1633075877 {\n  text-align: center;\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\t<div id=\"text-3327157544\" class=\"text\">\n\t\t\n\n<div>&nbsp;<\/div>\n<div>&nbsp;<\/div>\n\t\t\n<style>\n#text-3327157544 {\n  color: rgb(0,0,0);\n}\n#text-3327157544 > * {\n  color: rgb(0,0,0);\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\n<style>\n#section_896749744 {\n  padding-top: 0px;\n  padding-bottom: 0px;\n  background-color: rgb(247, 247, 247);\n}\n#section_896749744 .section-bg-overlay {\n  background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.85);\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/section>\n\t\n<div class=\"accordion\" rel=\"\">\n\n<div class=\"accordion-item\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"accordion-title plain\"><button class=\"toggle\"><i class=\"icon-angle-down\"><\/i><\/button><span>Consideatrion on the S, F and P parameters<\/span><\/a><div class=\"accordion-inner\">\n\n<h3>Considerations on the S parameter<\/h3>\n<div>It is necessary to make an assessment on the type of injuries that could result from a failure of the safety function. EN 13849-1 proposes only two possibilities:<\/div>\n<ul>\n<li>S1 = slight injury<\/li>\n<li>S2 = severe injury<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Slight injuries are considered to be scratches, peeling, bruising, lacerations without complications. Amputations, loss of function of a limb, loss of an eye, death are considered serious injuries.<\/p>\n<h3>Considerations on parameter F<\/h3>\n<div>The distinction between F1 and F2 can be formulated as follows:<br>F2 is chosen if the frequency of exposure to the hazard is greater than once every 15 minutes.<\/div>\n<div>F1 is chosen if the frequency of exposure to the hazard is not greater than once every 15 minutes and the accumulated exposure time does not exceed 1\/20 of the overall operating time<\/div>\n<h3>Considerations on the probability of occurrence of the dangerous event<\/h3>\n<div>The probability of the occurrence of a dangerous event depends on both human behaviour and technical failures, it should be based on factors such as:<\/div>\n<ul>\n<li>Reliability data of the control system<\/li>\n<li>History of accidents on similar machines (with the same risk, same process, same operator action and same technology causing the hazard).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The probability of occurrence is always evaluated to be equal to 1 because in most cases, the correct probability is not known or is difficult to estimate.<\/p>\n<p>If the probability of occurrence of a dangerous event can be judged low, the PL r can be reduced by one level.<\/p>\n\t<section class=\"section\" id=\"section_1571113370\">\n\t\t<div class=\"bg section-bg fill bg-fill  bg-loaded\" >\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t<div class=\"is-border\"\n\t\tstyle=\"border-color:rgb(235, 235, 235);border-width:1px 0px 0px 0px;\">\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t<div class=\"section-content relative\">\n\t\t\t\n\n<div class=\"row row-large align-middle align-center\"  id=\"row-508744684\">\n\n\n\t<div id=\"col-1337797428\" class=\"col medium-4 small-12 large-4\"  >\n\t\t<div class=\"col-inner text-center\"  >\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">Tree type graph of decisions for Plr value determination if (P) probability of a dangerous event occurring can be judged low<\/p>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\n\t<div id=\"col-1640290605\" class=\"col medium-8 small-12 large-8\"  >\n\t\t<div class=\"col-inner dark\"  >\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n\t<div class=\"img has-hover x md-x lg-x y md-y lg-y\" id=\"image_759200968\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"img-inner dark\" >\n\t\t\t<img width=\"1020\" height=\"510\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-2-1024x512.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large\" alt=\"\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-2-1024x512.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-2-300x150.png 300w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-2-768x384.png 768w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-2-1536x768.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-2-2048x1024.png 2048w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_Risk-chart-tree-2-510x255.png 510w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1020px) 100vw, 1020px\" \/>\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n<style>\n#image_759200968 {\n  width: 100%;\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n\t<div id=\"text-2457582107\" class=\"text\">\n\t\t\n\n<p>Fig. 7 &#8211; Graph of decisions for evaluation of the Pl r if (P) probability of occurrence of a dangerous event can be judged low<\/p>\n\t\t\n<style>\n#text-2457582107 {\n  color: rgb(0,0,0);\n}\n#text-2457582107 > * {\n  color: rgb(0,0,0);\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\n\n<style>\n#row-508744684 > .col > .col-inner {\n  padding: 0px 0px 0px 0;\n}\n<\/style>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\n<style>\n#section_1571113370 {\n  padding-top: 30px;\n  padding-bottom: 30px;\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/section>\n\t\n\n<\/div><\/div>\n<div class=\"accordion-item\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"accordion-title plain\"><button class=\"toggle\"><i class=\"icon-angle-down\"><\/i><\/button><span>Overlapping of hazards<\/span><\/a><div class=\"accordion-inner\">\n\n<p>It is possible that the same person may be subjected to the simultaneous interaction of multiple hazards due, for example, to the presence of multiple dangerous movements of the machine that could potentially create harm.<\/p>\n<p>If the evaluation of the probability of failure were made by taking into account all the hardware components of the overall safety related control system, very high PFH<sub>D<\/sub> values would soon be reached (even if components with very high MTTF<sub>D<\/sub> values were used) with consequent impossibility to stay within the required PL r.<\/p>\n<p>Things get even more complicated if the individual risks require different PL r.<\/p>\n<p>To overcome the problem it is allowed to separate the risks, if this is possible, and to assign to each of them a separate safety function.<\/p>\n<p>The designer must analyse this possibility during the risk assessment process. First, the dangerous zone is identified, then all dangerous movements of the machine parts that are located in the same dangerous zone are identified, then all the operations carried out by the machine in the same zone are considered and which are the parts of the body that are subjected to risk.<\/p>\n<p>If the analysis shows the possibility of separating the various dangerous movements, then a separate safety function is assigned to each dangerous movement and the relevant PL is calculated.<\/p>\n<h4>Example 1<\/h4>\n<p>In a working cell that involves several robots on different operations, the stopping function following the actuation of the light curtain can be evaluated individually for each robot.<\/p>\n\t<section class=\"section\" id=\"section_868494086\">\n\t\t<div class=\"bg section-bg fill bg-fill  bg-loaded\" >\n\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\t<div class=\"is-border\"\n\t\tstyle=\"border-color:rgb(235, 235, 235);border-width:1px 0px 0px 0px;\">\n\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t<div class=\"section-content relative\">\n\t\t\t\n\n<div class=\"row row-large align-center\"  id=\"row-282426510\">\n\n\n\t<div id=\"col-719933510\" class=\"col medium-7 small-12 large-7\"  >\n\t\t<div class=\"col-inner text-center\"  >\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n<p style=\"text-align: left;\">For the example of the machining cell shown in the picture, the following safety functions can be identified:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">SF1: The interruption of the safety curtain involves the stopping of all robot 1 drives<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">SF2: The interruption of the safety curtain involves the stopping of all the robot 2 drives<\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: left;\">SF3: The interruption of the safety curtain involves the stopping of all robot 3 drives<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\n\t<div id=\"col-194417903\" class=\"col medium-5 small-12 large-5\"  >\n\t\t<div class=\"col-inner dark\"  >\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n\t<div class=\"img has-hover x md-x lg-x y md-y lg-y\" id=\"image_293678382\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"img-inner dark\" >\n\t\t\t<img width=\"800\" height=\"667\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/safety-img02_3-robot.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large\" alt=\"\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/safety-img02_3-robot.png 800w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/safety-img02_3-robot-300x250.png 300w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/safety-img02_3-robot-768x640.png 768w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/safety-img02_3-robot-510x425.png 510w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/>\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n<style>\n#image_293678382 {\n  width: 100%;\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n\t<div id=\"text-3245368055\" class=\"text\">\n\t\t\n\n<p>Fig. 8 &#8211; Working cell involving multiple robots on different operations<\/p>\n\t\t\n<style>\n#text-3245368055 {\n  color: rgb(0,0,0);\n}\n#text-3245368055 > * {\n  color: rgb(0,0,0);\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\n\n<style>\n#row-282426510 > .col > .col-inner {\n  padding: 0px 0px 0px 0;\n}\n<\/style>\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\t\n<style>\n#section_868494086 {\n  padding-top: 30px;\n  padding-bottom: 30px;\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/section>\n\t\n<p>The same consideration applies for example to a rotary table equipped with several clamping devices; the risk assessment can be done separately for each clamp.<\/p>\n<h4>Example 2<\/h4>\n<p>In a welding robot the operator is exposed simultaneously to the risk of crushing due to the movement of the robot head and to the risk of burning due to the tool mounted on the head. In this case the robot head and tool must be taken into account at the same time in the evaluation of the safety function.<\/p>\n<h4>Example 3<\/h4>\n<p>For a robot in learning mode it is possible to keep power to the robot when the entrance door of the cell is open, only if a local enabling device (hold-to-run control) is used and that the robot is operated at a reduced safety speed.<\/p>\n<p>The probability of failure of all three devices (door interlock, hold-to-run and speed monitor) must therefore be included in the calculation of the PFHD because the dangerous failure of one of them immediately leads to a dangerous condition.<\/p>\n\n<\/div><\/div>\n<div class=\"accordion-item\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"accordion-title plain\"><button class=\"toggle\"><i class=\"icon-angle-down\"><\/i><\/button><span>Identification of the safety function and design specification<\/span><\/a><div class=\"accordion-inner\">\n\n<p>To decide which safety functions are required, the intended use of the machine must be considered (including reasonably foreseeable misuse). For each safety function, a document must be drawn up in which at least the following specifications are detailed:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Result of the risk assessment for each hazard (PL r value)<\/li>\n<li>Behaviour that is intended to be achieved or prevented with the safety function (e.g. when the guard is opened the machine performs a stop Cat.0)<\/li>\n<li>Intended use of the machine and reasonably foreseeable misuse<\/li>\n<li>Operation in emergency conditions<\/li>\n<li>Safety function response time<\/li>\n<li>Restart after a protective action (automatic or manual restart)<\/li>\n<li>Actuation mode (related to a section or part of the machine)<\/li>\n<li>Need to suspend the safety function (muting, banking)<\/li>\n<li>By-pass mode of the safety function for repair, tuning, cleaning, troubleshooting, etc.<\/li>\n<li>Description of connections between different safety function, if eny<\/li>\n<li>Safety function actuation frequency<\/li>\n<li>Priority of functions which, if active at the same time, can cause operating conflicts<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>To help the designer, the standard lists the main safety functions that are generally implemented in an SRP \/ CS and for some of them it provides the main safety requirements:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Safety related stop function started by a safety measure<\/li>\n<li>Manual restart function<\/li>\n<li>Start \/ Restart function<\/li>\n<li>Local command function<\/li>\n<li>Muting function<\/li>\n<li>Hold-to-run control function<\/li>\n<li>Enable device<\/li>\n<li>Prevention of unexpected start-up<\/li>\n<li>Escape and rescue of trapped people<\/li>\n<li>Isolation function and energy dissipation<\/li>\n<li>Command mode and enable mode<\/li>\n<li>Emergency stop function<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Safety-realted stop function<\/h4>\n<p>The stop function activated by the actuation of a protective device must bring the machine to a safe state in the shortest time possible.<\/p>\n<p>The safety-related stop unction has priority over a stop for operational reasons.<\/p>\n<p>When a group of machines work together, it is necessary to report to the supervisory control and \/ or to the other machines the existence of the safety stop.<\/p>\n<p>After the actuation of a stop command by a protective device, the stop condition must be maintained until a safe condition exist for restarting<\/p>\n<p>After a stop command by a protection device activation, the stop condition of the machine must be maintained until safe conditions exist for restarting.<\/p>\n<h4>Manual restart function<\/h4>\n<p>Reset command restarts the protective device and cancels the safety stop command. If established by the risk assessment, this cancellation must be confirmed through a manual, separate and deliberate action (manual reset). <br>The manual reset function:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>It must be authorized through a separate device, included in the SRP \/ CS and operated manually<\/li>\n<li>It must be enabled only if all protective devices are operational<\/li>\n<li>The manual restart must not initiate a movement or a dangerous situation<\/li>\n<li>It must take place through deliberate action<\/li>\n<li>It must enable the control system to accept the start command<\/li>\n<li>It must be enabled only when the machine actuator is in the OFF state<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Muting function<\/h4>\n<p>Muting function must not expose people to dangerous situations. During Muting, the safety conditions must be guaranteed by other protection devices. At the end of Muting, all the safety functions of the SRP \/ CS must be reset automatically. The PL of the parts of the SRP \/ CS that perform the Muting function must not decrease the safety level of the protective device to which are connected.<\/p>\n<h4>Safety related parameters<\/h4>\n<p>When the deviation of parameters such as position, speed, temperature or pressure, beyond the set limits can cause safety problems, the control system must implement appropriate measures (for example, stopping, warning signal, alarm).<\/p>\n<h4>Fluctuations, loss and restoration of power sources<\/h4>\n<p>When fluctuations in power levels exceed the designed operating range, including loss of power, the SRP \/ CS must continue to provide or send output signals that allow other parts of the machine system to maintain a safe state.<\/p>\n<h4>E \u2013 Stop<\/h4>\n<p>The E-Stop is defined as a &#8220;complementary protection measure&#8221; (it is not a safety function).<\/p>\n<p>It is used to reduce the risk of unreasonably foreseeable failure or accidents in parts of the machine, including failure of protective devices. Since it must be available in case of failure of the other protective devices, it is also advisable to consider it in EN ISO 13849-1.<\/p>\n<p>It must be available and operational at all times and must bypass all other functions and operating modes of the machine (without compromising any structures designed for the escape of trapped peoples). Any start command <br>(voluntary, unintentional, or unexpected) must not have effect on those parts of the machine stopped by the E-stop command until the device is manually reset.<\/p>\n<p>The PL r of the E-Stop function should be the same of the safety function with the highest PL r involved in the realisation of the SRP \/ CS.<\/p>\n<h4>Local control function<\/h4>\n<p>When a machine is locally controlled, e.g. by means of a portable control device it is necessary that:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The local control device selector must be located outside the danger zone<\/li>\n<li>Local control must be active only in the part of the dangerous area identified by the risk analysis<\/li>\n<li>The change from local control to main control must not create a dangerous situation<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Response time<\/h4>\n<p>When, following the risk assessment, it is found that the response time of the SRP \/ CS can be decisive for safety purposes, its response time must be added to the response time of the other devices of the safety loop in order to get the overall response time of the machine.<\/p>\n<p>The overall response time required for stopping the machine can affect the design of the SRP\/CS, e.g, for some applications it can be necessary to add a braking system.<\/p>\n\n<\/div><\/div>\n<div class=\"accordion-item\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"accordion-title plain\"><button class=\"toggle\"><i class=\"icon-angle-down\"><\/i><\/button><span>Realization of a safety function with an SRP\/CS<\/span><\/a><div class=\"accordion-inner\">\n\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14.4px;\">A safety function can be done using one or more SRP\/CS.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14.4px;\">All available technologies can be used, also in combination; electrical, hydraulic, pneumatic, mechanical etc.<br><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-size: 14.4px;\">It is also possible for an SRP\/CS to implement safety functions and normal command functions (for example a photoelectric light curtain or two-hand control can be used for both protection and start cycle).<\/span><\/p>\n\t<div class=\"img has-hover x md-x lg-x y md-y lg-y\" id=\"image_121506220\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"img-inner dark\" >\n\t\t\t<img width=\"1020\" height=\"166\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture-2-1024x167.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large\" alt=\"\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture-2-1024x167.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture-2-300x49.png 300w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture-2-768x125.png 768w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture-2-1536x251.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture-2-2048x335.png 2048w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture-2-510x83.png 510w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1020px) 100vw, 1020px\" \/>\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n<style>\n#image_121506220 {\n  width: 100%;\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Fig. 9 &#8211; Typical architecture of the SRE \/ CS<\/p>\n\t<div class=\"img has-hover x md-x lg-x y md-y lg-y\" id=\"image_1506110995\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"img-inner dark\" >\n\t\t\t<img width=\"1020\" height=\"589\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture_2-1024x591.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large\" alt=\"\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture_2-1024x591.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture_2-300x173.png 300w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture_2-768x443.png 768w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture_2-1536x887.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture_2-2048x1182.png 2048w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/07\/EN_SRP_architecture_2-510x294.png 510w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1020px) 100vw, 1020px\" \/>\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n<style>\n#image_1506110995 {\n  width: 100%;\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\">Fig. 10 &#8211; Several safety functions can share one or more SRP\/CS<\/p>\n<p>The designer has to decide the required contribution to risk reduction for each safety function.<\/p>\n<p>The evaluation of PL r must be carried out separately for each individual safety function.<\/p>\n<h4>SRP\/CS design phase &#8211; Organisational aspects<\/h4>\n<p>Before creating an SRP\/CS, in order to reduce as much as possible the introduction of systematic failures during the design phase or as a result of subsequent modifications, it is necessary to have a management organization that follows structured procedures covering the entire life cycle of the SRP\/CS. Each design activity should be properly specified, documented and verified.<\/p>\n\n<\/div><\/div>\n<div class=\"accordion-item\"><a href=\"#\" class=\"accordion-title plain\"><button class=\"toggle\"><i class=\"icon-angle-down\"><\/i><\/button><span>PL of the SRP\/CS<\/span><\/a><div class=\"accordion-inner\">\n\n<p>PL is a function of several factors such as:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Hardware and software architecture<\/li>\n<li>Ability to promptly detect internal failures potentially affecting the safety function<\/li>\n<li>Component reliability, the ability to limit common cause failures<\/li>\n<li>Quality of the design<\/li>\n<li>Environmental conditions and operational stresses<\/li>\n<li>The operating cycle of the machine.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Intended use and reasonably foreseeable misuse must be considered.<\/p>\n<p>The table below summarizes the quantitative requirements, assigning them an overall value of probability of dangerous failure, and the qualitative aspects that must be met in order to obtain a PL.<\/p>\n\t<div class=\"img has-hover x md-x lg-x y md-y lg-y\" id=\"image_2078473148\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<div class=\"img-inner dark\" >\n\t\t\t<img width=\"1020\" height=\"407\" src=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/EN_requirement-1024x409.png\" class=\"attachment-large size-large\" alt=\"\" decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/EN_requirement-1024x409.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/EN_requirement-300x120.png 300w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/EN_requirement-768x306.png 768w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/EN_requirement-1536x613.png 1536w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/EN_requirement-2048x817.png 2048w, https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/EN_requirement-510x203.png 510w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1020px) 100vw, 1020px\" \/>\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n<style>\n#image_2078473148 {\n  width: 100%;\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n<p>Fig. 11 &#8211; Mandatory qualitative and quantitative requirements to be met for safe control system design according to ISO 13849-1<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reminder<\/strong><\/p>\n<div><span style=\"font-size: 14.4px;\">Average Probability of Dangerous Failure\/Hour is only one of the parameters contributing to assignment of PL. To claim a PL rating, it is also mandatory to prove having considered and complied with all requirements, including:<br>&#8211; Monitoring of systematic failures<br>&#8211; Using robust and reliable components (according to Product Standards if available)<br>&#8211; Use of good engineering practice<br>&#8211; Considering environmental conditions in which the safety-related system will operate<br>&#8211; In the case of new software, adopting all organisational aspects of V-type development model shown in Figure 6 of ISO 13849-1 and meeting development requirements for application SW and enbedded SW.<\/span><\/div>\n<h4>PFH<sub>D<\/sub> Calculation<\/h4>\n<p>The method used for the evaluation of the part of the PL linked to the quantitative aspects is the computation of the probability that a dangerous failure may occur to the SRP\/CS in a certain period of time, considering the reliability of its components.<\/p>\n<p><strong>NOTE<\/strong>: The greater the contribution to risk reduction provided by the safety function the lower must be the PFH<sub>d <\/sub>(average probability of dangerous failure) of the SRP\/CS. A fault is considered dangerous ifit inhibits the protection function of the safety related control-system.<\/p>\n<p>The Average probability of dangerous failure for a safety-related control system, or for a sub-system, may be estimated in various ways. These methods require the use of complex mathematical formulas which typically belong to the field of system reliability theory. The use of such methods implies that for each components the following are known:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Failure rate (\u03bb)<\/li>\n<li>Percent distribution of failure rate for each component failure modes, (example: for a positive action switch the failure modes are: the contact will not open when required = 20% of the times and the contact will not close when required = 80% of the times<\/li>\n<li>The effect of each failure on safety-related system performance, (e.g dangerous failure or not dangerous failure)<\/li>\n<li>Percent of dangerous failures detected (by automatic self-diagnostic techniques implemented) out of total dangerous failures<\/li>\n<li>Percent of dangerous failures not detected (by automatic self-diagnostic techniques implemented) out of total dangerous failures<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>ISO 13849-1 simplifies this process by replacing the mathematical formulas with precalculated tables for different combinations of Categories, average MTTFD and DC values which are also determined through tables<\/p>\n<p>Design of an SRP\/CS as per ISO 13849-1 may be summarized in the following eight steps:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>Selection of system structure (architectures)<\/li>\n<li>Calculation of MTTF<sub>D<\/sub><\/li>\n<li>Selection of the self-diagnostic techniques and DC calculation<\/li>\n<li>Verification of CCF for redundant architecture<\/li>\n<li>Calculation of PL using Table 5 or Table K.1<\/li>\n<li>Verification of PL (if calculated PL is below PL r return to Step 1)<\/li>\n<li>Validation.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n<\/div>\n\t<div id=\"gap-1147433332\" class=\"gap-element clearfix\" style=\"display:block; height:auto;\">\n\t\t\n<style>\n#gap-1147433332 {\n  padding-top: 30px;\n}\n<\/style>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n<h2>Categories and their relationship with the MTTF<sub>D<\/sub>, with the DC and with the CCFs<\/h2>\n<p>EN \/ ISO 13849 uses a methodology based on 5 particular structures called &#8220;Categories&#8221; which constitute the backbone on which all the quantifiable aspects that contribute to the formation of the PL are based.<\/p>\n<p>The categories describe the performance of an SRP\/CS in relation to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Structural arrangement of its parts<\/li>\n<li>Its fault tolerance<\/li>\n<li>Its behaviour under fault conditions<\/li>\n<li>Reliability of its components<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This means that the safety performance is achieved not only through particular hardware architectures (which the standard defines as designated architecture), but also through a careful use of reliable components and, if necessary, of adequate monitoring techniques. The choice of a category mainly depends on:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Ammount of risk reduction needed<\/li>\n<li>Required performance level (PL r)<\/li>\n<li>Technology used<\/li>\n<li>Type of risk due to the failure of the SRP\/CS<\/li>\n<li>Possibility to avoid systematic failures in the SRP\/CS<\/li>\n<li>Probability of failures in the SRP\/C<\/li>\n<li>Mean Time to Dangerous Failure (MTTF<sub>D<\/sub>)<\/li>\n<li>Diagnostic coverage (DC)<\/li>\n<li>Common Cause Failures (CCF) in the case of categories 2, 3 and 4<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>It should be noted that the designated architectures give a logical representation of the system structure, while the technical implementation and the functional circuit diagram may appear completely different.<\/p>\n<p>Designated architectures can also be used to describe a part or a sub-part of a control system responding to certain input signals and generating safety output signals. Therefore the &#8220;input&#8221; block can represent, for example, a photoelectric light curtain (AOPD) or switch contacts. The &#8220;output&#8221; block can represent, for example, a safety-related output (OSSD) or a combination of relay contacts.<\/p>\n<p>For categories 3 and 4 the dual channel representation does not mean that all parts need to be physically redundant but that redundant means exist to ensure that a single fault cannot lead to the loss of the safety function.<\/p>\n<p>There are certainly several ways to create architectures that can satisfy the requirements established by the categories. If the structure of the control system is made by one (or more) of the 5 categories, then for the computation of the safety performance level (PL) it is possible to use the simplified procedures described in the standard.<\/p>\n<p>If an architecture deviates from those of the Categories, then its PL cannot be evaluated with the simplified method of the standard, but must be justified by other analytical means, for example by Markov modeling, in order to show that through this non designated architecture it is possible to achieve the required performance level (PL r). Markov offers a remarkable ability to manage many of the technical characteristics that are implemented in modern safety devices, for example it is possible to model periodic events such as automatic fault diagnostics tests.<\/p>\n<div class=\"is-divider divider clearfix\" style=\"max-width:100px;\"><\/div>\n\n<div class=\"row\"  id=\"row-1575358086\">\n\n\n\t<div id=\"col-56498447\" class=\"col medium-4 small-12 large-4\"  >\n\t\t<div class=\"col-inner\"  >\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n\t<div class=\"ux-menu stack stack-col justify-start ux-menu--divider-solid\">\n\t\t\n\n\t<div class=\"ux-menu-link flex menu-item\">\n\t\t<a class=\"ux-menu-link__link flex\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/functional-safety-standards\/\"  >\n\t\t\t<i class=\"ux-menu-link__icon text-center icon-angle-left\" ><\/i>\t\t\t<span class=\"ux-menu-link__text\">\n\t\t\t\tFunctional Safety standards\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\n\t<div id=\"col-1398980380\" class=\"col medium-4 small-12 large-4\"  >\n\t\t<div class=\"col-inner\"  >\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\n\t<div id=\"col-769947512\" class=\"col medium-4 small-12 large-4\"  >\n\t\t<div class=\"col-inner text-right\"  >\n\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\n\n\t<div class=\"ux-menu stack stack-col justify-start ux-menu--divider-solid\">\n\t\t\n\n\t<div class=\"ux-menu-link flex menu-item\">\n\t\t<a class=\"ux-menu-link__link flex\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/overview-of-the-main-safety-requirements-and-functional-characteristics-of-the-5-categories\/\"  >\n\t\t\t<i class=\"ux-menu-link__icon text-center icon-angle-right\" ><\/i>\t\t\t<span class=\"ux-menu-link__text\">\n\t\t\t\tOverview of the main safety requirements and functional characteristics of the 5 categories\t\t\t<\/span>\n\t\t<\/a>\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n\n\t<\/div>\n\t\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\n<\/div>\n\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\n\t\n\n<\/div>\n\t<div id=\"text-867201679\" class=\"text contenuto-nota\">\n\t\t\n\n<p>PL r(e) provides the greatest contribution to risk reduction, whereas PL r(a) makes the lowest contribution.<\/p>\n\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":0,"parent":38823,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"inline_featured_image":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"_uf_show_specific_survey":0,"_uf_disable_surveys":false},"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v20.1 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>ISO 13849-1\/2 Machinery Safety | ReeR<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Discover the complete article on machinery safety according to ISO 13849-1\/2. Ensure protection for your industrial equipment\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"ISO 13849-1\/2 Machinery Safety | ReeR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Discover the complete article on machinery safety according to ISO 13849-1\/2. Ensure protection for your industrial equipment\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"ReeR\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-07-16T13:43:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"17 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/\",\"name\":\"ISO 13849-1\/2 Machinery Safety | ReeR\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2021-07-23T13:04:59+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2024-07-16T13:43:54+00:00\",\"description\":\"Discover the complete article on machinery safety according to ISO 13849-1\/2. Ensure protection for your industrial equipment\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Academy\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Safety guide\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":4,\"name\":\"ISO 13849-1,2 Safety of Machinery\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/\",\"name\":\"ReeR\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":\"required name=search_term_string\"}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"ISO 13849-1\/2 Machinery Safety | ReeR","description":"Discover the complete article on machinery safety according to ISO 13849-1\/2. Ensure protection for your industrial equipment","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"ISO 13849-1\/2 Machinery Safety | ReeR","og_description":"Discover the complete article on machinery safety according to ISO 13849-1\/2. Ensure protection for your industrial equipment","og_url":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/","og_site_name":"ReeR","article_modified_time":"2024-07-16T13:43:54+00:00","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"17 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/","url":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/","name":"ISO 13849-1\/2 Machinery Safety | ReeR","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/#website"},"datePublished":"2021-07-23T13:04:59+00:00","dateModified":"2024-07-16T13:43:54+00:00","description":"Discover the complete article on machinery safety according to ISO 13849-1\/2. Ensure protection for your industrial equipment","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/iso-13849-12safety-of-machinery\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Academy","item":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Safety guide","item":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/academy\/industrial-safety-guide\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":4,"name":"ISO 13849-1,2 Safety of Machinery"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/","name":"ReeR","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"en-US"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/38995"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38995"}],"version-history":[{"count":30,"href":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/38995\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":66695,"href":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/38995\/revisions\/66695"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/38823"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.reersafety.cn\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38995"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}